Funnelens

Licorice.com

Facebook · Instagram · Messenger · Video

Active
Days running
44 days
Funnel score
56/100
Page speed
27/100

The ad

We wanted to put out the best damn licorice we can—and we did 🍬 50 flavors from traditional to sour, obsessed-over packaging, and super fast shipping. Soft, chewy texture paired with an explosion of flavor. Over 1 million customers have joined our family. Join us too.

Licorice Worth Ordering Online

Shop now
Angle: Quality craftsmanship & community belongingHook: Product superiority claim with social proofFormat: Product showcase video with lifestyle/testimonial elements

The funnel behind it

Licorice.com landing page

Offer: These sampler packs are the most popular and highest rated combinations of our bestselling half-size tubes of licorice.

56/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

This page does well on offer clarity—sampler packs are clearly positioned as popular, highly-rated combinations with specific product focus. Social proof is strong throughout with review counts (5,842 reviews, 918 reviews, etc.) and "BEST SELLER" badges visible on multiple products. However, the page suffers significantly on speed (PageSpeed 27/100 = 2.7/10), which is critical for e-commerce. The headline "SAMPLER PACKS" is generic and doesn't match the ad's compelling "Licorice Worth Ordering Online" positioning. Trust elements are present (reviews, ratings) but the page lacks prominent trust signals like guarantees or company credentials. The CTA buttons are small and use generic "ADD" language rather than the ad's "Shop now" promise. Mobile optimization appears adequate but the overall experience is hampered by poor performance.

What this funnel does right. Steal these.

  • Social proof8/10
  • Offer clarity8/10

Where it's weak

  • Page speed3/10
  • Headline3/10
  • Message match4/10
  • Call to action5/10

Full breakdown

Call to action

5/10

Primary CTAs are small 'ADD' buttons in burgundy, with secondary 'VIEW' options, but lack the compelling 'Shop now' language from the ad.

What works
  • Clear burgundy 'ADD' buttons are visually distinct and repeated on every product
  • Secondary 'VIEW' option provides alternative engagement path
  • CTAs are positioned consistently below each product
What hurts
  • Generic 'ADD' language doesn't match ad's 'Shop now' promise
  • Buttons appear small relative to product images
  • No primary CTA above the fold—first CTA appears mid-page

Page speed

3/10

PageSpeed score of 27/100 converts to approximately 2.7/10, indicating severe performance issues that will hurt conversion and user experience.

What hurts
  • PageSpeed score of 27/100 is critically low
  • Slow load times will increase bounce rate and reduce conversions
  • Poor performance especially damaging for e-commerce where speed directly impacts sales

Trust signals

6/10

Review counts and ratings provide trust signals, but page lacks prominent trust badges, guarantees, security seals, or company credentials visible in the screenshots.

What works
  • Extensive review counts (5,842, 918, 2,002+ reviews) on multiple products
  • Star ratings visible on products
  • 'BEST SELLER' badges indicate popularity and social proof
What hurts
  • No visible money-back guarantee or satisfaction guarantee
  • No security badges or trust seals visible
  • No company credentials, awards, or certifications shown

Mobile experience

6/10

Layout appears responsive with products in a grid, but small text, cramped buttons, and the 'SPIN TO WIN' popup overlay suggest mobile experience could be improved.

What works
  • Grid layout adapts to show products in columns
  • Product images are visible and clear
  • Navigation and search accessible at top
What hurts
  • Review counts and star ratings are very small and hard to read on mobile
  • 'ADD' and 'VIEW' buttons are cramped and small
  • 'SPIN TO WIN' popup overlay takes up significant screen real estate and may frustrate users

Headline

3/10

Generic 'SAMPLER PACKS' headline lacks the compelling value proposition from the ad ('Licorice Worth Ordering Online').

What works
  • Headline is clear and directly names the product category
What hurts
  • Generic and uninspiring—doesn't communicate why these packs are special
  • Doesn't match ad's compelling positioning about quality and flavor
  • Misses opportunity to highlight the 'best damn licorice' promise

Social proof

8/10

Multiple review counts and star ratings visible on nearly every product (5,842 reviews, 918 reviews, 2,002 reviews, etc.) plus 'BEST SELLER' badges throughout.

What works
  • Review counts prominently displayed under each product image (5,842 reviews, 918 reviews, 2,002 reviews visible)
  • 'BEST SELLER' and 'NEW' badges on multiple products
  • Star ratings visible on products
What hurts
  • No aggregate social proof at top of page (e.g., '1 million customers' mentioned in ad is not visible)
  • Individual review counts are small and hard to read at mobile size

Message match

4/10

Page focuses on 'sampler packs' and ratings but doesn't emphasize the ad's key messages: 50 flavors, quality obsession, fast shipping, or the 1 million customer milestone.

What works
  • Product focus on licorice sampler packs aligns with ad's licorice category
  • Quality implied through 'highest rated' language matches ad's quality promise
What hurts
  • No mention of '50 flavors' or flavor variety highlighted in ad
  • Fast shipping promise from ad is not visible on page
  • '1 million customers' social proof from ad is not mentioned

Offer clarity

8/10

Sampler packs are clearly explained as 'most popular and highest rated combinations of bestselling half-size tubes' with specific product focus visible throughout.

What works
  • Descriptive subheading explains what sampler packs are and why they're popular
  • Multiple product options shown with clear pricing ($53-$99 range)
  • Product names clearly indicate contents (Best Sellers, Sour, Red, Around the World, etc.)

Your own page

You just read somebody else's funnel. What does yours score?

The score above came from the real landing page behind this ad, graded on 8 CRO factors. Run your own page through the same rubric, free, and see what each factor found and where you give up the most ground.

Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.

Keep exploring

Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.