Funnelens

Silver Fern Brand landing page teardown

The page at silverfernbrand.com has been the destination of a Silver Fern Brand Facebook ad for 100 days. We captured it and scored it 53/100 on the 8-point CRO checklist below.

Offer on the page: Immune+ Protocol (Postbiotic+ Stick Pack) - $117.59, Free Shipping on orders $49+

silverfernbrand.com landing page
?What is a CRO score?

CRO stands for Conversion Rate Optimization: turning more of the visitors you already have into customers. This score (0 to 100) rates how well a landing page is built to convert, across 8 factors like offer, headline, speed, trust, and mobile. Read the full explainer →

53/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

This page does well establishing credibility through detailed scientific explanations of immune system mechanics, ingredient breakdowns with branded components (BIOMend, BetaVia, IMMUSE), and a clear three-step protocol framework. The 100K+ community badge and "Real Reviews from Real Customers" messaging add social proof. However, the page suffers from significant message mismatch with the ad—the ad promotes a free quiz for personalized protocol recommendations, but the page immediately sells a specific product without acknowledging the quiz or offering customization. The CTA is buried below extensive educational content, mobile optimization appears adequate but the page is text-heavy, and trust signals like customer testimonials are mentioned but not shown in the visible sections. The offer clarity is moderate; while pricing is clear ($117.59), the value proposition relies heavily on understanding the science rather than benefit-driven copy.

What this page does right. Steal these.

  • Call to action7/10
  • Page speed7/10

Where it leaks conversions

  • Message match2/10
  • Social proof4/10
  • Headline5/10

Full breakdown

Call to action

7/10

Primary CTA 'ADD TO CART' is visually prominent with green button, but it's positioned after extensive educational content rather than early in the page flow.

What works
  • Bright green 'ADD TO CART' button is highly visible and contrasts well
  • CTA appears in natural product purchase flow (after price, severity, quantity selection)
  • Button size and color make it stand out from surrounding text
What hurts
  • CTA is positioned far down the page, requiring significant scrolling before purchase option appears
  • No secondary CTAs or urgency elements (limited stock, countdown timer, etc.)
  • No alternative CTA matching the ad's 'QUIZ' offer—page doesn't acknowledge the free quiz mentioned in ad

Page speed

7/10

PageSpeed score of 69 converts to approximately 6.9 on 0-10 scale; page loads adequately but has room for optimization, particularly for image and video content.

What works
  • Page appears to load and display content without major delays
  • Navigation and basic page structure render quickly
What hurts
  • PageSpeed score of 69 indicates moderate performance issues
  • Multiple product images and supplement fact labels may slow load time
  • Embedded video player could impact initial page load speed

Trust signals

6/10

Page builds trust through detailed scientific explanations, branded ingredient callouts (BIOMend, BetaVia, IMMUSE), and community size badge, but lacks visible customer testimonials and has FDA disclaimer that may undermine claims.

What works
  • Detailed scientific explanations of immune system and ingredient mechanisms
  • Branded, recognizable ingredients (BIOMend, BetaVia, IMMUSE) with logos displayed
  • 100K+ community badge signals social proof and scale
What hurts
  • FDA disclaimer at bottom ('These statements have not been evaluated...') may reduce trust in health claims
  • No visible customer testimonials or case studies despite mentioning 'Real Reviews'
  • No company credentials, certifications, or third-party testing badges shown

Mobile experience

6/10

Page appears to have mobile-responsive layout with stacked elements, but text-heavy content and long scrolling requirements may create friction on mobile devices.

What works
  • Navigation menu appears to be mobile-accessible (hamburger menu visible in top right)
  • Product images and supplement facts appear to be responsive
  • Add to cart button is large enough for mobile interaction
What hurts
  • Extensive text content requires significant scrolling on mobile, creating friction
  • Video player in product section may not auto-play or load efficiently on mobile
  • Multiple dropdown menus and product options may be cumbersome on small screens

Headline

5/10

Headline is generic and feature-focused ('New and Improved') rather than benefit-driven or problem-focused.

What works
  • Uses brand name 'Immune+ Protocol' for recognition
  • Signals product update with 'New and Improved'
What hurts
  • No benefit or problem statement—doesn't answer 'why should I care?'
  • Doesn't differentiate from competitors or explain unique value
  • Doesn't connect to the ad's promise of personalized protocol recommendations

Social proof

4/10

Page mentions 'Real Reviews from Real Customers' and '100K+ improving their gut health' badge, but no actual customer testimonials, ratings, or reviews are visible in the provided screenshots.

What works
  • 100K+ community badge displayed prominently below product options
  • 'Real Reviews from Real Customers' text appears in header area
What hurts
  • No actual customer reviews, ratings, or testimonials shown on page
  • No star ratings visible despite mentioning real reviews
  • No specific success stories or before/after results displayed

Message match

2/10

Severe mismatch: ad promotes a free, no-obligation quiz to determine personalized protocol recommendations, but page immediately sells a specific product without mentioning the quiz or offering customization.

What works
  • Page does address gut health and protocols as mentioned in ad
  • Product name 'Immune+ Protocol' aligns with ad's protocol discussion
What hurts
  • Ad's primary CTA is 'Comment QUIZ' for free personalized recommendations; page has no quiz or customization option
  • Ad emphasizes 'no obligation' and 'free'; page immediately asks for $117.59
  • Ad discusses multiple protocol steps and customization; page sells single product without acknowledging personalization

Offer clarity

6/10

Price is clearly stated ($117.59) and free shipping threshold is visible, but the actual product contents and why this specific severity level matters are buried in technical explanations.

What works
  • Price prominently displayed: $117.59
  • Free shipping threshold clearly stated: on orders $49+
  • Severity dropdown shows product options (Mild Issues, Moderate to Severe)
What hurts
  • No clear benefit statement above the fold—headline focuses on 'new and improved' without explaining what problem it solves
  • Product differentiation unclear—why choose this over other immune supplements?
  • Dosing and timeline expectations buried deep in page (Step 1 Mild Issues - 90 days)

Your own page

That is one page's teardown. Now get your own.

Same 8-factor rubric, same evidence-backed notes, on your landing page instead of theirs. Free, no signup, about 30 seconds.

Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.

Keep exploring

Captured from the public page at silverfernbrand.com; ad data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with Silver Fern Brand or Meta. See data sources.