Funnelens

Earthwise Seed Company

Facebook · Instagram · Audience Network · Carousel

Active
Days running
61 days
Funnel score
43/100
Page speed
29/100

The ad

Earthwise Seed Company ad creative

Rethink what your lawn can be — beautiful, low-maintenance, and beneficial for pollinators.

Earthwise Seed Company

Shop now
Angle: Lifestyle transformation through sustainable lawn careHook: Aspirational benefit statementFormat: Carousel

The funnel behind it

Earthwise Seed Company landing page

Offer: All natural, Alternative Lawn Seed Blends

43/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

This collections page does well on trust and message match—it delivers exactly what the ad promises (low-maintenance, pollinator-friendly lawn alternatives) with clear product categories and sustainability messaging. However, it suffers from critical weaknesses: the page speed is severely poor (29/100), the headline "COLLECTIONS" is generic and non-compelling, and the primary CTA is buried within product cards rather than prominently featured. Social proof is minimal (no reviews, testimonials, or trust badges visible), and the offer clarity could be stronger—visitors must click into categories to understand specific products. The mobile experience appears functional but the slow load time will hurt conversion significantly.

What this funnel does right. Steal these.

  • Message match8/10

Where it's weak

  • Social proof1/10
  • Headline2/10
  • Page speed3/10
  • Call to action4/10
  • Trust signals5/10

Full breakdown

Call to action

4/10

Multiple 'SHOP NOW' buttons exist within product cards, but no primary above-the-fold CTA and no email signup CTA is prominent until the footer.

What works
  • Green 'SHOP NOW' buttons are visible and action-oriented within each category card
  • Email signup CTA in the middle of the page ('Join Our Community') is clearly visible with arrow indicator
  • Multiple CTAs provide options for different user intents
What hurts
  • No prominent primary CTA above the fold—users must scroll to engage
  • CTA buttons are distributed across category cards rather than consolidated
  • Email signup form lacks urgency or compelling copy beyond 'Exclusive Offers'

Page speed

3/10

PAGESPEED_SCORE of 29 converts to approximately 2.9/10, indicating severe performance issues that will harm conversion.

What hurts
  • Page speed score of 29/100 is critically poor—users will experience long load times
  • Slow loading will increase bounce rate, especially on mobile devices
  • Performance issues directly contradict the 'eco-friendly' messaging (wasted energy/bandwidth)

Trust signals

5/10

Company mission and sustainability commitment are clearly stated, but lack of reviews, certifications, or customer validation weakens trust.

What works
  • Detailed sustainability statement explains use of recyclable aluminum bags and environmental commitment
  • Company logo and branding are consistent and professional
  • Contact information and multiple support channels visible (phone, email, chat)
What hurts
  • No customer reviews, ratings, or testimonials to validate product quality
  • No third-party certifications, awards, or trust badges visible
  • No social proof of customer satisfaction or product popularity

Mobile experience

6/10

Layout appears responsive with stacked cards and readable text, but slow page speed will severely impact mobile experience.

What works
  • Product cards stack vertically for mobile viewing
  • Text is readable and properly sized for mobile screens
  • Navigation menu is accessible via hamburger icon
What hurts
  • Page speed of 29 will cause significant mobile load delays and abandonment
  • No indication of mobile-specific optimizations or fast-loading images
  • Chatbot overlay may obstruct mobile viewing on smaller screens

Headline

2/10

The headline 'COLLECTIONS' is generic, non-descriptive, and fails to communicate value or differentiation.

What hurts
  • Generic word 'COLLECTIONS' provides no benefit statement or reason to engage
  • Doesn't reinforce the ad's promise about beautiful, low-maintenance, pollinator-friendly lawns
  • Misses opportunity to set expectations or highlight the eco-friendly positioning

Social proof

1/10

No customer reviews, testimonials, ratings, trust badges, or social proof elements are visible anywhere on the page.

What hurts
  • No star ratings or review counts on any products or categories
  • No customer testimonials or success stories visible
  • No trust badges, certifications, or third-party validation displayed

Message match

8/10

The page directly delivers on the ad's promise: low-maintenance lawn alternatives, pollinator-friendly options, and eco-friendly positioning are all prominently featured.

What works
  • Ad mentions 'low-maintenance' and page leads with 'Low-Maintenance Lawn Alternatives' as first category
  • Ad emphasizes 'beneficial for pollinators' and page features 'Native & Pollinator Lawns' and 'Clover Lawn' categories
  • Sustainability messaging in footer matches ad's eco-friendly positioning
What hurts
  • Ad says 'beautiful' but page doesn't emphasize aesthetic benefits in headlines or descriptions

Offer clarity

6/10

Product categories are clearly labeled with descriptive names, but specific offers and pricing are hidden behind category cards requiring clicks.

What works
  • Category names clearly describe benefits (e.g., 'Low-Maintenance Lawn Alternatives Eco-Friendly & Water Wise')
  • Visual product cards with images help users understand what each collection contains
  • Descriptive subheadings like 'All natural, Alternative Lawn Seed Blends' explain the core offering
What hurts
  • No pricing visible on the collections page—users must click to see costs
  • No clear indication of what makes each blend different or which to choose
  • Lack of specific product counts or bundle details on category cards

More ads from Earthwise Seed Company

View all →

Your own page

You just read somebody else's funnel. What does yours score?

The score above came from the real landing page behind this ad, graded on 8 CRO factors. Run your own page through the same rubric, free, and see what each factor found and where you give up the most ground.

Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.

Keep exploring

Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.