Bloom & Bond
Facebook · Instagram · Messenger · Image
The ad
We need to address something. A brand called Lenoria has been copying our ads, our videos, and our packaging. We caught them. And we're calling it out publicly. Here's the problem: ✅ Same look ✅ Same claims ❌ NOT the same product Bloom & Bond is the original, built specifically for women in perimenopause and menopause experiencing hormonal hair loss. 🌿 Cold-pressed pumpkin seed oil 🔬 Clinically-studied saw palmetto 💪 Two ingredients. Real doses. Full transparency. 80,000+ women have trusted us with their regrowth journey. We're not about to let a copycat confuse the women we built this for. If you've seen our ads or packaging anywhere else, make sure you're getting the real thing. 👉
⚠️ Don't Get Fooled By The Copycat
Learn moreThe funnel behind it
Offer: Bloom & Bond is the original, built specifically for women in perimenopause and menopause experiencing hormonal hair loss. Cold-pressed pumpkin seed oil, clinically-studied saw palmetto, two ingredients, real doses, full transparency.
Funnel score
8-point CRO breakdown
How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.
This page excels at building trust through detailed expert credibility (Dr. Patricia Sullivan, board-dermatologist, 20+ years), transparent product comparisons (fake vs. real side-by-side), and emotional resonance with the target audience (women over 40 frustrated by failed treatments). The message strongly matches the ad's copycat warning theme. However, the page suffers from poor mobile optimization (text-heavy, image-dependent layout), slow load speed (51/100), and lacks clear conversion mechanics—the primary CTA is buried in the headline rather than prominently displayed as a button. Social proof is present but limited to one expert voice and implied customer numbers ("80,000+ women") without visible reviews or testimonials. The offer clarity is strong on product differentiation but weak on what action the visitor should take next.
What this funnel does right. Steal these.
- Message match9/10
- Trust signals8/10
- Offer clarity8/10
- Headline7/10
Where it's weak
- Mobile experience3/10
- Call to action4/10
- Page speed5/10
- Social proof5/10
Full breakdown
Call to action
4/10The primary CTA 'Read this before you buy' is embedded in the headline and not presented as a prominent button; no secondary CTAs are visible in the captured sections.
- CTA text is action-oriented and creates urgency ('before you buy')
- Placement in headline ensures early visibility
- No visible button-style CTA; text-only call-to-action lacks visual prominence
- CTA is not repeated or reinforced lower on the page in the visible sections
- No clear next step after reading (e.g., 'Shop Now', 'Get the Real Product', 'Verify Your Purchase')
Page speed
5/10PageSpeed score of 51/100 converts to approximately 5/10, indicating slow load times that will negatively impact user experience and conversion.
- PageSpeed score of 51/100 indicates significant performance issues
- Heavy image content (multiple product comparisons, expert photo) likely contributes to slow load
- Slow speed will increase bounce rate, especially on mobile
Trust signals
8/10The page builds trust through expert credibility, transparent product comparisons, detailed scientific explanations, and third-party testing claims, though some elements lack independent verification.
- Dr. Patricia Sullivan's credentials and photo establish expert authority
- Detailed scientific explanation of DHT, hormone mechanisms, and extraction methods
- Transparency about third-party testing, cGMP certification, and published certificates of analysis
- Expert is the co-formulator, creating potential bias perception
- No visible third-party certifications or badges (e.g., FDA, dermatologist association logos)
- Claims about Lenoria's formula (heat-processed, ineffective) are stated but not independently verified
Mobile experience
3/10The page is heavily image-dependent with long text blocks that likely don't reflow well on mobile; no visible responsive design adjustments in the screenshots.
- Images are centered and appear to scale
- Long paragraphs of body text without clear mobile-optimized spacing or line breaks
- Side-by-side product comparisons (fake vs. real) may be difficult to view on small screens
- No visible mobile-specific navigation or simplified layout
Headline
7/10The headline is attention-grabbing and problem-focused, but it's a statement rather than a benefit-driven hook.
- Scammers Alert warning icon immediately signals urgency and relevance
- Specific problem statement (copying ads, videos, packaging) creates credibility
- Emotional resonance for the target audience (women concerned about counterfeit products)
- Headline is more defensive than aspirational; doesn't lead with the benefit (regrowth)
- Long, complex sentence structure may reduce clarity on mobile
Social proof
5/10Page relies heavily on one expert (Dr. Patricia Sullivan) and mentions '80,000+ women' but provides no visible customer reviews, testimonials, or third-party certifications beyond the expert's credentials.
- Dr. Patricia Sullivan's credentials prominently displayed: board-dermatologist, 20+ years in practice, co-formulator
- Mention of '80,000+ women' who have trusted the brand for regrowth
- Third-party testing callout: independent testing, cGMP certification, certificates of analysis published
- No visible customer testimonials or reviews with names/photos
- No star ratings or review counts displayed
- Expert is the founder/co-formulator, which could be perceived as biased rather than independent validation
Message match
9/10The page directly addresses the ad's core message: warning about a copycat brand and establishing Bloom & Bond as the original with superior formulation.
- Ad headline 'Don't Get Fooled By The Copycat' is directly reinforced throughout the page
- Ad's emphasis on product differentiation (cold-pressed, clinically-studied) is detailed extensively
- Ad's trust-building claim ('80,000+ women') is echoed on the page
Offer clarity
8/10The page clearly differentiates the real product from the fake through side-by-side comparisons and explains the cold-pressed vs. heat-processed distinction with clinical detail.
- Side-by-side fake vs. real product images with clear labeling
- Detailed explanation of cold-pressed vs. heat-processed extraction methods and their efficacy
- Specific ingredient callouts: cold-pressed pumpkin seed oil, saw palmetto, DHT blocker mechanism
- No clear pricing or package options visible on the page
- No explicit call-to-action button until far down the page; primary CTA is embedded in headline text
More ads from Bloom & Bond
View all →
380dIMAGEBloom & Bond
Help Hair Loss Naturally
Help Hair Loss Naturally
33dVIDEOHelp Hair Loss Naturally
33dIMAGELimited Time Sale Ends Soon
33dIMAGELimited Time Sale Ends Soon
Your own page
You just read somebody else's funnel. What does yours score?
The score above came from the real landing page behind this ad, graded on 8 CRO factors. Run your own page through the same rubric, free, and see what each factor found and where you give up the most ground.
Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.
Keep exploring
Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.