Funnelens
Free audit
Library/supplements· ALL

Bloom & Bond

Facebook · Instagram · Messenger · Video

Active
All Bloom & Bond ads & funnels →Meta Ad Library
Days running
7 days
Funnel score
48/100
Page speed
38/100

The ad

Bloom & Bond ad creative

🚀 Confidence starts from the roots. ✔️ Natural DHT-blocking formula ✔️ Less breakage, more volume, undeniable thickness ✔️ Supports stronger, healthier strands from within Limited stock available! 👉 https://trybloomandbond.com/pages/after-years-of-watching

Help Hair Loss Naturally

Learn more
Angle: Natural hair loss solution with clinically-backed DHT blockingHook: Confidence/transformation promise with urgency (limited stock)Format: Video
View this ad in Meta Ad Library →

The funnel behind it

Bloom & Bond landing page

Offer: LIMITED TIME: Get up to 95% off our #1 pick

Full landing page teardown →Visit landing page →
48/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

This page excels at building credibility through expert authority (Dr. Patricia Sullivan), detailed educational content explaining DHT's role in hair loss, and a clear product evaluation framework. The comprehensive comparison of six hair products with transparent scoring creates trust. However, the page suffers from poor mobile optimization (text and images likely stack poorly on small screens), very slow load time (38/100 PageSpeed), and a disconnect between the ad's promise of a "natural DHT-blocking formula" and the actual product recommendations shown (which include Minoxidil, a pharmaceutical treatment). The primary CTA is buried and unclear—"CHECK AVAILABILITY" doesn't clearly lead to purchase, and the page lacks a prominent, action-oriented button. Social proof is limited to the author's credentials without customer testimonials or reviews visible in the captured sections.

What this funnel does right. Steal these.

  • Headline8/10

Where it's weak

  • Mobile experience2/10
  • Call to action3/10
  • Message match3/10
  • Page speed4/10
  • Social proof4/10

Full breakdown

Call to action

3/10

Primary CTA 'CHECK AVAILABILITY' is vague, not action-oriented, and appears only once in the visible sections without prominence.

What works
  • CTA button has contrasting color (white on orange banner)
What hurts
  • CTA text 'CHECK AVAILABILITY' is passive and doesn't clearly indicate purchase or next step
  • Button is positioned in the top banner, not near product information or call-to-action copy
  • No secondary CTAs visible to guide users through the page

Page speed

4/10

PageSpeed score of 38/100 converts to approximately 3.8 on 0-10 scale; very slow load time will hurt conversion.

What hurts
  • PageSpeed score of 38 indicates significant performance issues
  • Multiple large images (product photos, before/after grid) likely not optimized
  • Slow load time will increase bounce rate, especially on mobile

Trust signals

6/10

Expert author credentials and detailed product evaluation framework build trust, but lack of customer testimonials and slow site performance undermine it.

What works
  • Author is identified as Dr. Patricia Sullivan with Beauty expertise
  • Transparent product scoring methodology explained ('Editorial Scorecard')
  • Detailed pros/cons for each product reviewed
What hurts
  • No customer reviews or testimonials visible
  • No company information, about page, or contact details visible
  • Slow site performance (PageSpeed 38) suggests poor technical credibility

Mobile experience

2/10

Page appears to have poor mobile optimization with long text blocks, large images, and likely poor responsive layout.

What works
  • Top banner with CTA is sticky and accessible on mobile
What hurts
  • Long headline will likely wrap awkwardly on small screens
  • Large product images (4-grid layout) will stack poorly on mobile
  • Dense text blocks without clear mobile-friendly formatting

Headline

8/10

Strong, benefit-driven headline that addresses a specific pain point (wasting money) and promises a solution.

What works
  • Specific and relatable: 'After Years of Watching Women Waste Money'
  • Clear promise: 'Here's What I Tell Them Instead'
  • Emotional resonance with target audience (women concerned about hair loss)
What hurts
  • Headline is long and may not fully display on mobile devices
  • Doesn't mention the specific solution (DHT-blocking or natural formula)

Social proof

4/10

Limited social proof visible; only author credentials (Dr. Patricia Sullivan, Beauty category, June 2026 update) are shown without customer testimonials or review counts.

What works
  • Author byline with professional title (Dr. Patricia Sullivan)
  • Publication date and category (Beauty, 8 min read) adds credibility
What hurts
  • No customer reviews, ratings, or testimonials visible
  • No mention of how many women have used the recommended product
  • No trust badges, certifications, or third-party validation shown

Message match

3/10

Significant disconnect between ad promise ('Natural DHT-blocking formula') and page content (recommends Minoxidil, a pharmaceutical drug, as #3 product).

What works
  • Page addresses hair loss and DHT, matching ad's core topic
  • Educational content aligns with 'learn more' CTA in ad
What hurts
  • Ad claims 'natural DHT-blocking formula' but page reviews Minoxidil (synthetic pharmaceutical) as a top option
  • Ad emphasizes 'less breakage, more volume, undeniable thickness' but page doesn't clearly identify which product delivers these benefits
  • Ad's 'limited stock available' urgency doesn't match page's educational, comparison-focused tone

Offer clarity

6/10

The offer mentions '95% off our #1 pick' but the actual product being sold is unclear until deep into the page.

What works
  • Limited-time urgency banner at top ('LIMITED TIME: Get up to 95% off')
  • Clear product rankings with grades (e.g., Minoxidil rated C, 5/10)
What hurts
  • No clear statement of what product is being sold or its price
  • The #1 pick is not explicitly identified in visible sections
  • Discount percentage (95% off) seems exaggerated and lacks context

More ads from Bloom & Bond

View all →
380dIMAGE

Bloom & Bond

—funnel score
Creative expired
70dVIDEO

Help Hair Loss Naturally

—funnel score
Creative expired
64dVIDEO

Help Hair Loss Naturally

—funnel score
33dVIDEO

Help Hair Loss Naturally

—funnel score
33dIMAGE

Limited Time Sale Ends Soon

—funnel score
33dIMAGE

Limited Time Sale Ends Soon

—funnel score

Your own page

You just read somebody else's funnel. What does yours score?

The score above came from the real landing page behind this ad, graded on 8 CRO factors. Run your own page through the same rubric, free, and see what each factor found and where you give up the most ground.

Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.

Keep exploring

Niche hub
Best supplements Facebook ads
Advertiser
Bloom & Bond Facebook ads
Teardown
trybloomandbond.com landing page teardown

Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.