Library/beauty· US

Based Supplies

Facebook · Instagram · Audience Network · Video

Active

All Based Supplies ads & funnels →Visit site Meta Ad Library

Days running

260 days

Funnel score

65/100

Page speed

40/100

The ad

Applying foreign ingredients to your skin daily can RUIN your natural skin microbiome, leading to long-term damage. Protect your skin and your health with our all-natural Tallow & Honey Balm—a simple, powerful alternative to big pharma skincare products. Crafted with the purest ingredients, our balm deeply nourishes and restores, keeping your skin balanced and radiant. Elevate your skincare routine with nature’s finest—shop now and claim your jar of Tallow & Honey Balm today! 🐄

Restore Your Skin in 3 Weeks!

Learn more

Angle: Fear-based health concern (microbiome damage) + natural/clean beauty alternative positioningHook: Problem-agitation (negative consequence of conventional skincare)Format: Video with text overlay

View this ad in Meta Ad Library →

The funnel behind it

Offer: All-natural Tallow & Honey Balm—no chemicals, suitable for sensitive skin, eco-friendly packaging, grass-fed ingredients

Visit landing page →

65/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

This landing page effectively builds trust through abundant social proof and detailed product education, with a clear natural/clean positioning that matches the ad's core message. However, it suffers from critical performance issues (40 PageSpeed score) that will severely limit conversions. The ad's '3-week restoration' claim creates a credibility gap—the page doesn't substantiate this timeline, which could trigger skepticism. The CTA is passive ('Check Availability') rather than action-oriented, and the long-form educational content, while persuasive, may overwhelm mobile users. The page excels at addressing objections and building authority but needs urgent speed optimization and stronger, more urgent CTAs to maximize conversion potential.

What this funnel does right. Steal these.

Trust signals: Strong trust signals: real customer testimonials with photos, high review count (1,897), comparison vs competitors, specific ingredient sourcing (grass-fed tallow, organic honey), sustainability messaging, eco-friendly packaging, mentions of reputable sources (Mayo Clinic, Healthline logos). Glass jar with metal lid adds premium feel. Minor concern: '3-week' claim needs clinical backing.
Social proof: Strong social proof: 4.8★ rating with 1,897 reviews, multiple customer testimonials with photos/names, real user quotes addressing specific pain points (sensitive skin, eczema, psoriasis). Testimonials appear authentic and detailed.
Mobile experience: Layout appears mobile-responsive with stacked sections. Images scale appropriately. Text is readable. However, multiple CTAs and long-form copy may create friction on mobile. No obvious mobile-specific optimization.
Message match: Good alignment on core message (natural ingredients, no chemicals, sensitive skin solution). Ad emphasizes 'microbiome damage' risk; page focuses on benefits. Ad's '3-week' claim not matched on page. Overall fit is solid but not perfect.
Offer clarity: Clear value proposition (all-natural, no chemicals, multi-benefit balm). However, the '3 weeks' claim in headline isn't substantiated on page. Pricing/exact offer details missing until bottom.

Where it's weak

Page speed: PageSpeed score of 40 is poor. Slow load times significantly harm conversion rates, especially for mobile users. This is a critical issue—likely high bounce rate before content is even visible.

Full breakdown

Call to action6/10

Primary CTA 'Check Availability' is clear but weak—passive language. Secondary CTAs exist but inconsistent. 'Learn more' in ad doesn't match page's primary action. Multiple CTAs dilute focus. No urgency messaging beyond 'limited inventory' note.

Page speed3/10

PageSpeed score of 40 is poor. Slow load times significantly harm conversion rates, especially for mobile users. This is a critical issue—likely high bounce rate before content is even visible.

Trust signals8/10

Strong trust signals: real customer testimonials with photos, high review count (1,897), comparison vs competitors, specific ingredient sourcing (grass-fed tallow, organic honey), sustainability messaging, eco-friendly packaging, mentions of reputable sources (Mayo Clinic, Healthline logos). Glass jar with metal lid adds premium feel. Minor concern: '3-week' claim needs clinical backing.

Mobile experience7/10

Layout appears mobile-responsive with stacked sections. Images scale appropriately. Text is readable. However, multiple CTAs and long-form copy may create friction on mobile. No obvious mobile-specific optimization.

Headline6/10

Attention-grabbing ('Restore Your Skin in 3 Weeks') but makes a specific timeframe claim not clearly supported by page content. Page headline is more cautious ('One Jar, Countless Benefits'). Mismatch creates credibility concern.

Social proof8/10

Strong social proof: 4.8★ rating with 1,897 reviews, multiple customer testimonials with photos/names, real user quotes addressing specific pain points (sensitive skin, eczema, psoriasis). Testimonials appear authentic and detailed.

Message match7/10

Good alignment on core message (natural ingredients, no chemicals, sensitive skin solution). Ad emphasizes 'microbiome damage' risk; page focuses on benefits. Ad's '3-week' claim not matched on page. Overall fit is solid but not perfect.

Offer clarity7/10

Clear value proposition (all-natural, no chemicals, multi-benefit balm). However, the '3 weeks' claim in headline isn't substantiated on page. Pricing/exact offer details missing until bottom.