Frøya Organics
Facebook · Instagram · Audience Network · Video
The ad
The $8 billion peptide lie that's aging your skin faster 💉 Dermatologists are quietly admitting what they've known for years: Synthetic peptides don't just stop working after a few weeks... They're actually teaching your skin to stop making its own collagen. Lab-made peptides (Matrixyl, Argireline, Copper Peptides, all of them) are designed to send "repair signals" to your skin. But here's the problem: Your skin doesn't recognize them. Think of it like this: Your skin cells have receivers that evolved to respond to peptides from plants and natural sources, not chemicals created in a lab in 2002. So what happens when you flood your skin with these fake signals every single day? Your skin gets lazy. It's the same reason cortisone creams stop working over time... except you're paying $180/month for peptide serums. After 2 years, the average woman has spent $4,320 and her skin is actually producing LESS collagen than when she started. The breakthrough came from an unexpected place: A 2024 study found that peptides from Arctic plants (sea buckthorn, calendula, arnica, marigold) have nearly identical molecular structures to the peptides your own skin makes naturally. These aren't synthetic. They're not lab-created knockoffs. When concentrated in pure beeswax (waterless formula = zero dilution), these plant peptides don't replace your skin's signals, They remind your skin how to make collagen on its own again in about 3-4 weeks. Here's why this matters: Instead of creating dependency, phytopeptides work with your biology. They wake up the collagen production that synthetic peptides put to sleep. No $180 monthly subscriptions that trap you forever. Just restoring what worked naturally before the beauty industry convinced you that you needed lab-made solutions. The small Scandinavian lab that cracked this formula is selling out every 6 days → Source: Dierckx et al., Frontiers in Medicine (2024)
Everything You Knew About Peptides Is Wrong 🧬
Shop nowThe funnel behind it
Offer: 46% off - Pick your biggest concerns & save extra
Funnel score
8-point CRO breakdown
How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.
This landing page effectively captures the ad's core message about natural vs synthetic peptides and presents a clear discount offer (46% off). The personalization angle through concern-selection buttons is smart UX. However, the page significantly underdelivers on trust-building elements critical for a premium skincare product making bold scientific claims. The absence of customer testimonials, reviews, certifications, or detailed credentials is a major CRO weakness. The moderate PageSpeed score (62) suggests optimization opportunities. The page succeeds in message matching and mobile experience but fails to establish the social proof and trust necessary to convert skeptical visitors making a $180+/month commitment. The ad's urgency ('selling out every 6 days') isn't reinforced on the landing page, missing a conversion opportunity.
What this funnel does right. Steal these.
- Mobile experience: Layout appears mobile-optimized with stacked buttons, readable typography, and appropriate spacing. Full-width orange buttons are touch-friendly. No obvious mobile usability issues in visible sections.
- Headline: Strong, curiosity-driven headline 'WANT 46% OFF?' directly addresses the offer. Subheading 'Pick your biggest concerns & save extra!' creates engagement through personalization.
- Message match: Excellent alignment between ad and landing page. Ad's core claim about synthetic peptides vs natural Arctic plant peptides is reinforced. Discount offer (46% off) matches ad promise. Concern-selection buttons align with ad's benefit-driven approach.
- Offer clarity: 46% off discount is clearly stated at top. Product positioning (Arctic plant peptides vs synthetic) is well-explained, though the exact product name and full pricing details aren't visible in captured sections.
Where it's weak
- Social proof: Minimal social proof visible. One academic citation (Dierckx et al., 2024) mentioned in ad copy but no customer testimonials, reviews, ratings, or trust badges visible on page. No user-generated content or case studies shown.
- Trust signals: Brand logo (FRØYA) present at top. One academic citation provided. However, lacks essential trust signals: no customer reviews/ratings visible, no security badges, no return policy mention, no company credentials, no third-party certifications shown. Extraordinary claims about peptides require stronger substantiation.
Full breakdown
Primary CTA 'Shop now' is present but generic. Secondary option 'I want to pay full price' provides alternative path. CTAs lack urgency language or scarcity messaging despite ad mentioning 'selling out every 6 days.'
PageSpeed score of 62 indicates moderate performance. Acceptable but not optimal for conversion. Mobile experience may experience slight delays affecting user experience and bounce rates.
Brand logo (FRØYA) present at top. One academic citation provided. However, lacks essential trust signals: no customer reviews/ratings visible, no security badges, no return policy mention, no company credentials, no third-party certifications shown. Extraordinary claims about peptides require stronger substantiation.
Layout appears mobile-optimized with stacked buttons, readable typography, and appropriate spacing. Full-width orange buttons are touch-friendly. No obvious mobile usability issues in visible sections.
Strong, curiosity-driven headline 'WANT 46% OFF?' directly addresses the offer. Subheading 'Pick your biggest concerns & save extra!' creates engagement through personalization.
Minimal social proof visible. One academic citation (Dierckx et al., 2024) mentioned in ad copy but no customer testimonials, reviews, ratings, or trust badges visible on page. No user-generated content or case studies shown.
Excellent alignment between ad and landing page. Ad's core claim about synthetic peptides vs natural Arctic plant peptides is reinforced. Discount offer (46% off) matches ad promise. Concern-selection buttons align with ad's benefit-driven approach.
46% off discount is clearly stated at top. Product positioning (Arctic plant peptides vs synthetic) is well-explained, though the exact product name and full pricing details aren't visible in captured sections.
More ads from Frøya Organics
View all →
546dVIDEOUltra-Potent Natural Skincare
531dIMAGESide-effect: my skin is glowing
454dVIDEOYounger SKIN or Money Back
412dIMAGEMy Husband Was Shocked
340dVIDEOYour skincare is making you age faster 🤯
340dIMAGE“My skin cells are waking up!”
Keep exploring
Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.