Funnelens

Beauty From Bees

Facebook · Instagram · Messenger · Video

Active
Days running
175 days
Funnel score
71/100
Page speed
36/100

The ad

Beauty From Bees ad creative

Ladies, your lotion might be making your skin drier. Most are over 80% water and synthetic fillers that sit on top of your skin — blocking your body’s natural ability to hydrate. Our 100% natural Body Serum works with your biology to feed your skin what it’s missing — restoring elasticity, glow, and real hydration. Use it daily and you’ll feel your body’s natural systems come back to life — the way nature intended. Clinically clean. 100% natural. 💛 Feel your skin come alive again.

Anti-Aging Without the Irritation

Shop now
Angle: Problem-agitation-solution: conventional lotions are counterproductive; natural alternative restores skin's biological functionHook: Contrarian claim (challenging conventional wisdom about lotions)Format: Video (likely product demo or before/after testimonial)

The funnel behind it

Beauty From Bees landing page
71/ 100

Funnel score

8-point CRO breakdown

How well the landing page behind the ad is built to convert, scored across 8 factors: offer, copy, speed, trust, mobile, message-match, CTA, and social proof.

What this funnel does right. Steal these.

  • Trust signals8/10
  • Social proof8/10
  • Offer clarity8/10
  • Mobile experience7/10
  • Headline7/10
  • Message match7/10

Where it's weak

  • Page speed4/10

Full breakdown

Call to action

6/10

Primary CTA 'Add to cart' is present but not visually dominant; secondary CTAs (subscription option, free serum offer) compete for attention and may dilute conversion focus.

What works
  • Clear 'Add to cart' button in black (high contrast)
  • Multiple CTA options provided (one-time purchase, subscription, free sample offer)
  • Trust signals below CTA ('30-Day Guarantee | Free Shipping $125+ | Made in Canada')
What hurts
  • CTA button appears to be cut off or not fully visible in the primary view
  • Too many competing CTAs (subscription, one-time, free offer) dilute focus
  • Free offer CTA ('Yes please!') may cannibalize primary purchase CTA

Page speed

4/10

PAGESPEED_SCORE of 36 converts to approximately 3.6/10, indicating significant performance issues that will hurt conversion rates and user experience.

What hurts
  • PAGESPEED_SCORE of 36 indicates very slow page load times
  • Slow speed will increase bounce rate and reduce conversions
  • Mobile performance likely severely impacted by slow speed

Trust signals

8/10

Strong trust signals including 38,331 5-star reviews, media features (ELLE, Good Housekeeping), detailed customer testimonials, 30-day guarantee, and emphasis on natural/pure ingredients.

What works
  • 38,331 5-star reviews with specific customer testimonials and dates
  • Featured in ELLE and Good Housekeeping (visible badges)
  • 30-Day Guarantee, Free Shipping $125+, Made in Canada messaging builds confidence

Mobile experience

7/10

Page appears mobile-responsive with stacked layout, readable text, and accessible buttons, though some elements may be cramped on smaller screens.

What works
  • Vertical stacking of product image, details, and CTAs is mobile-appropriate
  • Text is readable and not overly small
  • Product selector dropdowns (scent, size) are accessible
What hurts
  • Multiple CTAs and options may create scrolling fatigue on mobile
  • Product image carousel may be difficult to navigate on small screens
  • Popup modal for free serum offer takes up full screen, potentially blocking content

Headline

7/10

The page headline 'Deeply Hydrates, Strengthening Your Skin's Barrier' is benefit-focused but generic; the ad headline 'Anti-Aging Without the Irritation' is more compelling but doesn't appear on the page.

What works
  • Headline emphasizes core benefit (hydration and barrier strengthening)
  • Subheading clearly identifies product as 'Body Serum' with natural positioning
What hurts
  • Page headline doesn't match ad headline, missing the anti-aging angle
  • Headline is somewhat generic and doesn't differentiate from competitors
  • No urgency or unique angle in the main headline

Social proof

8/10

Strong social proof with 38,331 reviews at 5 stars, plus multiple named customer testimonials with dates and detailed feedback visible in the lower sections.

What works
  • 5-star rating with 38,331 reviews prominently displayed under the product name
  • Multiple detailed customer testimonials with names, dates, and specific product benefits mentioned (Lindsay Dwell, Jeri Pero-Fraser, Jenn Mcnab)
  • Featured in ELLE and Good Housekeeping badges visible on product image

Message match

7/10

Good alignment on core message (100% natural, anti-aging, hydration) but page emphasizes barrier repair and ingredient purity while ad emphasizes the problem (lotion making skin drier) and solution angle.

What works
  • Both ad and page emphasize '100% natural' positioning
  • Core benefit of hydration and skin restoration present in both
  • Anti-aging angle present in both (ad headline and page content about aging)
What hurts
  • Ad focuses on problem (lotion making skin drier) but page leads with benefits instead
  • Ad emphasizes 'clinically clean' but page emphasizes 'no synthetics' differently
  • Ad's biological/natural systems angle not strongly reflected in page copy

Offer clarity

8/10

The offer is clearly stated: a 100% natural body serum with specific benefits (hydration, elasticity, glow) and a free 8oz sample promotion is prominently displayed.

What works
  • Free Body Serum offer clearly stated with conditions ('Fill Your Cart $125+ of anything on the site')
  • Product benefits explicitly listed with icons (Soothes Irritation, Silky Not Greasy, 100% Natural, Barrier Repair)
  • Price clearly shown as CA$32.00 with size options (250ml/8oz)
What hurts
  • Free offer terms are somewhat buried and require reading fine print about the $125+ cart minimum
  • Multiple pricing options (one-time vs subscription) could create slight confusion about which is primary

More ads from Beauty From Bees

View all →

Your own page

You just read somebody else's funnel. What does yours score?

The score above came from the real landing page behind this ad, graded on 8 CRO factors. Run your own page through the same rubric, free, and see what each factor found and where you give up the most ground.

Free, no signup, no card. The same 8 factor score every page here was graded on.

Keep exploring

Data from the public Meta Ad Library. Funnelens is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta. See data sources.